There was an error in this gadget

Friday, 27 April 2012

Time to outlaw texts like this?

Received from 07549 449 486

"Hi. We now have the details of how much you are owed for your recent accident. Visit www.ukaccident.info to continue the process or txt stop"

Now I get about 5 of these a month from different numbers but look at it- clearly total spam. No accident, no query, no claim and no interest. I will text stop but they keep coming in.

Time for a law?

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Saturday, 7 April 2012

THIS new law will make buying cigarettes harder and less pleasurable.

Every smoker will be made inescapably aware, every time he or she buys a packetof cigarettes, that smoking is a disapproved activity.

It may push many smokers to give up. It will cause some tobacconists to close.

But this is the stated intention of the law, and I could fill up this article by arguing that it is an attack on adult free choice – that we have an absolute right to do things that are harmful to ourselves; that the claims about "passive smoking" are a statistical fraud; that the various claims about harm to children are also fraudulent.

Why bother? These arguments have had no success so far, and will have none now.

In a few decades, smoking has been demonised and restricted to the point where it may soon be effectively forbidden by law.

Libertarian arguments have failed. So has the numerical weight of smokers.

The only worthwhile question is why?

One reason is the cushy jobs provided by the anti-smoking movement – doctors who cure no one, but preach further restrictions on free choice; epidemiologists churning out bogus correlations; activists in charities funded by the taxpayers, or employed in central and local bureaucracies.

These people are a solid interest group, and have no desire for the truth to come between them and their next salary.

The other reason is that smokers, in the main, are "sheeple." Every time they are faced with robbery through taxation, or naked persecution, they simply roll over. Unlike some groups in society they never question the lies thrown at them. They never challenge the existence of the interest group that is working for their suppression.

Of course, smoking is less basic to identity than religion or sexual preference. But the persecution of smokers is a good example of how no freedom lasts when those who use it will not defend it. Tough luck smokers – you brought this on yourselves.


SEAN GABB IS DIRECTOR OF THE LIBERTARIAN ALLIANCE
Www.libertarian.co.uk

Location:Guest Post: Dr Sean Gabb on why smokers are to blame for their own demonisation

Friday, 6 April 2012

Breaking: Osborne hasn't commited to releasing tax information

This is a quick note since I'm about to tell the wonderful viewers of the BBC News Channel what I've just learnt from senior Treasury sources.

The Telegraph have an excellent front page, focusing on their interview with the Chancellor, however it's worth pointing out that the Chancellor has gone as far as to say he would "consider" personally releasing tax information - but it would have to be investigated carefully, balancing transparency with confidential tax information.

The point George Osborne was making was aimed at London Mayoral hopeful Ken Livingston, following the release of their tax records.

Officials and political sources in the Treasury are far from signed up to this idea, and it's not actually being "considered" just yet... but still, it's exciting talk.

Tune in to the BBC News Channel now for more.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Monday, 2 April 2012

Do Government know that HMRC could be forcing people out of work and on to benefits?

As of yesterday, I am officially self employed for the first time in my life. This means broadly that I’m responsible for all my own taxes, and PAYE is a concept that effects other people. Today I registered as self employed (I THINK) on the confusing HMRC website – but found that I was totally unable to get a reply on the “Newly self employed helpline”.


In the meantime, I am reapplying for Access to Work which supports employers, and self employed people with the additional costs incurred as a result of their disability. In my case, this might be a contribution to a reader / support worker, or for specialist equipment such as a Braille printer (though I already have one in this case). Access to Work could not have been more helpful. They have all my information already, since they have helpfully funded some support for me in the past – indeed until I left my staff job to go freelance last month. We’ve done the forms and they’re sending them to my home address for me to sign, and to include a Unique Tax Reference (UTR) number so that the application can proceed. As soon as the number is known, support can be provided – but quite understandably, until we know it, we can’t submit the form.

Quite simple you might think – call HMRC, explain the situation and have them send the UTR in the post in the next few days. But nope – not a bit of it. In common with many other people employed by us the honest taxpayer, when I got through to the miserable operator, her responses were abrupt and as if she was a school teacher, and I was a schoolboy wanting to hand in a squashed tomato instead of my homework. Only I’m not a naughty boy, I’m an honest taxpayer who wants to earn money as a self employed person and pay my tax.

The request was quite simple, I would be very grateful for a UTR in the post in the next few days to a week, because without one, I cannot discharge my duties as a self employed journalist since I require access to work support. Assuming this request really was beyond the wit of man, one might expect a degree of understanding, or at least manners – but no, “it’ll take six weeks and that’s all I can tell you”, and “it’s not a quick process” were all I was met with. I explained that without a UTR, I could actually lose my job since I won’t be able to do my job – but “you’ll just have to wait six weeks” was all she would say to me – as if these were the only words she’s learnt, and the only words she’s prepared to parrot.

As it happens, I’m confident that my main place of work will be sympathetic to my predicament – and that I can privately engage support until I get some movement – but I really do need the UTR, and quite clearly I could have lost my job and signed on the dole for all they could care.

How many people are being consigned to the welfare scrap yard due to uncaring and inefficient HMRC workers? I suspect quite a lot. HMRC have always been helpful in the past, so perhaps we can chalk this one up to a snappy miserable old bat – but then again, perhaps we can’t.